Britons living in Bulgaria. Guide to Bulgaria, Sofia and Varna

Spanish military figures... - Stirpes


Again, there is no equality of developments since some reduce, some improve human's versatile potential.__________________Magna Europa est patria nostra STOP GATS! All progressive racial types have an average and above average cranial volume in comparison to those of primitive character. All progressive racial types have an average and above average cranial volume in comparison to those of primitive character. And thats what making him more progressive. Any organism's success depends on the behavior of its contemporaries. Any organism's success depends on the behavior of its contemporaries. As long as group needs one of the too, there are traits "closer to perfection" = more fit to survive and for further development - and others further away. Because the most resistent monad will go extinct once this planet will fall with the end of the sun.As well as this threads comparison of progressive vs. Brachycephalicism is newer than dolichocephalicism. Brachycephalicism is newer than dolichocephalicism. Brachycephaly in itself is neither positive nor negative, it depends on the way it influences the whole structure of the face and head, its stability, cranial capacity etc. British pensioners have bought up thousands of flats on the Black Sea coast and in mountainous ski resorts. Bulgarian officials politely suggest that by restricting Bulgarians' right to move to the UK, Britain is guilty of double standards." I know it is not about Bulgaria and Spain is in the EU. But as humans its in our interests to see us progressing in the way described and to see the future of our offspring, of our species being secured, their survival on a high level. But as humans its in our interests to see us progressing in the way described and to see the future of our offspring, of our species being secured, their survival on a high level. But at least it is more of a tragedy for Britain.__________________'Dardanidae duri, quae uos a stirpe parentum prima tulit tellus, eadem uos ubere laeto accipiet reduces. But Bulgaria is experiencing its own wave of migration - from Britain. But in a species which is distributed worldwide true progress means worldwide advantages. But in a species which is distributed worldwide true progress means worldwide advantages. But no matter how humans will evolve on, if they evolve, a Homo erectus will be with a very high certainty never superior to Homo sapiens as a group, because what Homo erectus was is Homo sapiens in an improved version - and even more than that. But thats a situation human creativity and intelligence as well as culture should prevent. But thats a situation human creativity and intelligence as well as culture should prevent. But you can see a progress in differentiation, organisation, you can see that there was as development from lower organised organisms to higher organised ones and the latter being just possible through the development of the antecessors. But you can see a progress in differentiation, organisation, you can see that there was as development from lower organised organisms to higher organised ones and the latter being just possible through the development of the antecessors. Competitive ability of a strain was always better than its previous type, but competitiveness in a general sense was not increasing. Competitive ability of a strain was always better than its previous type, but competitiveness in a general sense was not increasing. Coon: Quote:"The Alpha and Omega of Homo Sapiens: An Australian aboriginal woman with a cranial capacity of under 1000 cc (Topsy, a Tiwi); and a Chinese sage with a brain nearly twice that size (Dr. Do you really think this experiment proves anything of importance for our discussion? Do you really think this experiment proves anything of importance for our discussion? Eickstedt or myself using it doesnt need to refer to "progress in evolution in general", but progress in humans in general. Eickstedt or myself using it doesnt need to refer to "progress in evolution in general", but progress in humans in general. Even at the beginning of this development the animal lost the former advantages but still has not all advantages of the new form. Even at the beginning of this development the animal lost the former advantages but still has not all advantages of the new form. Even in some Papua groups one can see that the typical chieftains being on average more progressive, as are officers, managers, scientists, versatile sportspeople, models, idealistic and capable political leaders etc. Even in some Papua groups one can see that the typical chieftains being on average more progressive, as are officers, managers, scientists, versatile sportspeople, models, idealistic and capable political leaders etc. Evolution produces progress because of competition - its just a progress inside of certain parameters of course, thats true. Evolution produces progress because of competition - its just a progress inside of certain parameters of course, thats true. Explain me how does a narrower nose play a positive role in cognitive abilities, give me the exact, literal link between a narrower nose of a nordid as opposition of the plumper one of alpiniods and as an example neurotransmitters like adrenaline. Explain me how does a narrower nose play a positive role in cognitive abilities, give me the exact, literal link between a narrower nose of a nordid as opposition of the plumper one of alpiniods and as an example neurotransmitters like adrenaline. Fittest equals those who fit into the ecological niche best, that’s evolution, nothing more. Fittest equals those who fit into the ecological niche best, that�s evolution, nothing more.Not for a mobile and globally acting species like humans. For most traits or behaviors there is likely no optimal design or strategy, only contingent ones Quote:They are better if they represent the same basic specialisation but are simply more effective than those which existed before. For most traits or behaviors there is likely no optimal design or strategy, only contingent onesWhat a poor example for talking about humans. Furthermore its true that evolution has no goal, so no evaluation, for sure no moral one, but we are finally humans, we dont look at ourselves like on an insect - and if only for the purpose of analysing us and our environment. Furthermore its true that evolution has no goal, so no evaluation, for sure no moral one, but we are finally humans, we dont look at ourselves like on an insect - and if only for the purpose of analysing us and our environment. Furthermore narrow noses signal usually dominance, attractiveness and refinement (positive for the sexual selection and social success), protect the respiratory apparatus and are advantageous in a variety of habitats. Hominisation is a very specific process which favours certain qualities. However, some earlier isolates can out compete strains that arose late in the experiment. However, some earlier isolates can out compete strains that arose late in the experiment. I asked if he has ever seen a French person besides on TV. I asked them what they know about the region and its history, and so forth. I can understand if some people feel uneasy about this kind of immigration. I can have used lesser, but it will still lack a part of the meaning.About the English immigrants here, what can I say that's not been already said?The lower class English that you mention is not the immigrant type. I don't see anything nordid about themIndeed. I don't think she is doing a serious effort though. I even said myself that degeneration can take place, but this will mean the extermination of truly human traits whereas progressive developments mean to strengthen them, making them even more effective. I even said myself that degeneration can take place, but this will mean the extermination of truly human traits whereas progressive developments mean to strengthen them, making them even more effective. I gave a classic example of natural selection in action through adaptation towards local conditions. I get the feeling these immigrants in your country do not care much about Spain. I got the impression that mostly richer working class and lower middle class Brits who think the French dislike the English and refuse to drink French wine move to Spain. I know a middle aged English couple who have relocated to southeastern Spain. I know many more upper middle class Brits with houses in southern France. I never denied that and its not the first time I said it, but for us humans thats the way to go and there is no "equality of developments", at least not from our own anthropocentric perspective which is the one which should matter. I once confronted an (not a very educated one) Englishman who went on about this issue for a long time. I only think that kind of thinking among Brits is interesting. I think that is really stupid and arrogant behaviour towards the hosts. I told him, "you don't need to say more, that is enough said". If you compare with mym thread, the balance of the head being mentioned and is for humans definitely a progressive traits - the more balanced the head is on the neck, the more progressive. If you compare with mym thread, the balance of the head being mentioned and is for humans definitely a progressive traits - the more balanced the head is on the neck, the more progressive. If you comparing such neutral organisms which have just limited abilities for gaining energy, dealing with competitors, reproducing etc.This has no significance for human development nor what I said before. If you comparing such neutral organisms which have just limited abilities for gaining energy, dealing with competitors, reproducing etc.This has no significance for human development nor what I said before. If you want to destroy any vestige of culture, life-style, aesthetics, etc., in any given spot they will do it quicker than if the spot got settled by Sub-Saharan Africans.The other type, the immigrant (or expat) is not much better in my opinion. IMO Nordid types in Spain are beside the Gothic influence, the remains of prehistoric depigmented Mediterranoid populations, the same with nordish Cromagnids in Spain, depigmented prehistoric Cr�-Magnons. In any case there is one rule for sure: Life reproduces life and tries to preserve life - at least of the own kind. In biological systems, evolution is brought by random changes in genetic sequencing = mutation. In fact, advantageous mutations appear to be exquisitely rare. In fact, evolution is change, regardless of the underlying causes be it mutation, migration, random drift etc.. In later competition experiments, each strain will out compete the immediately previously dominant type in a culture. In later competition experiments, each strain will out compete the immediately previously dominant type in a culture. In some spots this influx is strong enough to incide negatively over diversity in the future.Quote:Originally Posted by CyraxNorthern-European types in Spain, are most likely of decended from Celtic migration.Like Galaico has said, Celtic was mostly a process of aculturation. In that sense a whale is for its own specialisation more progressive than a his ancestors, same goes for a horse etc. In that sense progressive is objectively just one tendency out of others - there are just three basic tendencies beside more specific local adaptations in modern humans: Primitive, Infantile and Progressive. In that way there is progress even though evolution in itself "knows" just the basic rules of herself, like variation, selection etc. In that way there is progress even though evolution in itself "knows" just the basic rules of herself, like variation, selection etc. In the same way evolutionary paths, specialisations begin, at the start they are far from perfect, but just try to approach a certain effectiveness, further evolution, selective pressures from the environment and intraspecifically make them more effective. In which lies scientific objectivity to call a narrower nose more progressive, more new? In which lies scientific objectivity to call a narrower nose more progressive, more new? It made him think, at least I did something. Its a self-strengthening process which might lead at the end to a better ability to adapt to different situations, to a higher potential and more effective lifeform or not. Its a self-strengthening process which might lead at the end to a better ability to adapt to different situations, to a higher potential and more effective lifeform or not. Its about the human perspective and progress not about discussing from a philosophical point of view whether there is any progress in evolution or not and if every virus has the same level as the highest developed mammal - which it hasnt. Its about the human perspective and progress not about discussing from a philosophical point of view whether there is any progress in evolution or not and if every virus has the same level as the highest developed mammal - which it hasnt. Its in the interest of us, as a thinking lifeform which is able to use reason to recognise which traits give a general potential and which are just one sided - or still not as evolved. Its not about constructing a teleological moment with a fix goal, this goal can be, in our case, in the case of humans, only be man-made, but about observing the "products" of evolution and the fact that one level of organisation is based on the antecessor. Its not about constructing a teleological moment with a fix goal, this goal can be, in our case, in the case of humans, only be man-made, but about observing the "products" of evolution and the fact that one level of organisation is based on the antecessor. Just because you quoted an experiment you didnt gained an argument for higher mammals and not for relatively consequent evolutions. Just because you quoted an experiment you didnt gained an argument for higher mammals and not for relatively consequent evolutions. La Carolina) and the waves who are settling in Spain in modern days (English, Germans, Dutch, etc.). La Carolina) and the waves who are settling in Spain in modern days (English, Germans, Dutch, etc.). Lured by some of the cheapest property prices in Europe, British families have started new lives here. Modern Pygmy groups are in their way highly specialised too, but one sided, already "overspecialised" - reduced and dependent from a very specific niche, unable to defend their own territory nor evolving on for further expansion like more progressive forms. Most male and female models and idols being dominated by progressive variants, this was even true for non-European but higher evolved cultures with non-degenerated views on human beauty around the world. My point was that the development from monads without a true cell nucleus to modern mammals can be seen as a progress in the variation of life, of its organisation and differentiation. Naturally natural selection isn�t progress either, it�s a change to adaptation the principle that evolution isn't a progressing event isn't made up by me, its accepted science, proved and supported in a purely empirical manner � crucial base of science your theory lacks. Naturally natural selection isn�t progress either, it�s a change to adaptationYou described an irrelevant example because what you said is just what I described as "local adaptation" without significance for progressive developments neither in animals nor in humans. Neither do I have to explain, certainly not on colorations between intelligence, capacities and progressiveness, since that�s my first question and since that�s what you fail to do, againI spoke about it in the past, I will just highlight some aspects. North pole bears are pigmentation wise selected through a system of natural selection and aren�t more progressive in the sense of perfection than their darker kind in north america. North pole bears are pigmentation wise selected through a system of natural selection and aren�t more progressive in the sense of perfection than their darker kind in north america. Not that I am to them anyway.I read somewhere that on a recent enquire it turned out that about one third of the English will like to come to settle in Spain at some stage. Occasionally, a mutation will pop out of the woodwork that will allow its bearer to reproduce better than its compatriots. Occasionally, a mutation will pop out of the woodwork that will allow its bearer to reproduce better than its compatriots. Of course catastrophies can let a high grade of organisation fall back to a more primitive level again, but with time the process will begin again too. Of course catastrophies can let a high grade of organisation fall back to a more primitive level again, but with time the process will begin again too. One can say the complicated given of culture is a form of progress (one you use), but that’s subjective, temporary, time and place bound and even great apes have culture Quote:Originally Posted by agrippaEvolution just takes place, something which I said too. Only a very small percentage of genetic mutations are advantageous. Only a very small percentage of genetic mutations are advantageous. Other animals are as well fitted to their own circumstances and evolved that way. Other animals are as well fitted to their own circumstances and evolved that way.Finally you got it probably if thinking about it again. Other animals can be just as complex and "highly developed" as humans, but in different forms that are beyond our own comprehension due our limited perspective. Other animals can be just as complex and "highly developed" as humans, but in different forms that are beyond our own comprehension due our limited perspective. Other animals can indeed be in their way highly developed, absolutely. Paquin and adams placed a colony of yeast into a culture and maintained it for many successive generations. Past Hominisation already showed the path and this path was successful so far, all forms which deviated from it were eliminated. Primitive traits are phylogenetic, infantile ontogenetically retarded in comparison to the basic, "progressive" Hominisation tendency.If comparing Homo sapiens with Homo erectus directly, we see just progress, more potential, practically no losses - thats the point. Primitive traits are phylogenetic, infantile ontogenetically retarded in comparison to the basic, "progressive" Hominisation tendency.If comparing Homo sapiens with Homo erectus directly, we see just progress, more potential, practically no losses - thats the point. Progress in humans means that this qualities become more pronounced, improved. Progress in humans means that this qualities become more pronounced, improved. Progressive are mainly those traits which are generally Neohuman, neomorphic and advantageous or at least not disadvantageous. Progressive variants being more common in the social elite, in leading elements in almost every society of the world, at least if the elite being selected for effectiveness. Quote:are we supposed to take it just for granted? Quote:evolution proceeds in spite of natural selection like evolutionist george williams said, and natural selection is nothing more than adaptation to certain environments, so superiorism is out of question by definitionThats false for the niche at least. Quote:Originally Posted by agrippaWhat a poor example for talking about humans. Quote:Originally Posted by MynyddApart from the [Hispanic] Goths and the Suebi, in later times there have been some influxes of "vulgar Germanics", like Netherlanders and Germans to repopulate some areas in Andalusia (e.g. Quote:Paquin and adams placed a colony of yeast into a culture and maintained it for many successive generations. Quote:secondly, the supposition that progressiveness equals an increase of intelligence and capacities is still not supported by any data, and is dismissed by the means of common sense and daily realityAnother trait which is definitely progressive is a larger cranial volume. Reduced and infantle variants have usually a lower cranial volume too, but their main disadvantages is the weaker body and general potential. Same goes for Africa if comparing Sudanids and Bambutids (African Pygmies). Samples of the most successful strains from the culture were taken at a various times. Samples of the most successful strains from the culture were taken at a various times. Sanz Garc�a was made chief of the 26 Division composed of Anarchist volunteers, after the death of Durruti.In its baptism of fire in the Battle of Belchite, the passing of the Division was rather grey. She is at least trying to learn Spanish, that is showing some respect. Spanish Celts as all Atlantic Celts were original Paleo-European populations that adopted the Indo-European speech. Speaking about humans and their relatives, the denomination alone says how humans naturally saw their position and did rightfully do so: Primates. Speaking about humans and their relatives, the denomination alone says how humans naturally saw their position and did rightfully do so: Primates. Thats just a single trait, not the most important for us, but its an example for a functional aspect of progressiveness. That is only in the beggining stages, when they see themselves all alone. Thats the only subjective component in all of this, namely to directly evaluating it. The difference comes from the fact that those which specialise in an one sided way to unfavourable conditions, a rather unfavourable habitat lost general potential, abilities necessary to compete successfully with other human groups. The fact alone that negroids have wider noses is a reaction on their environment differently from europids. The fact alone that negroids have wider noses is a reaction on their environment differently from europids. The French may have another experience, I will like to know. The latter were better than all other Negroid forms adapted to the unfavourable conditions of the tropical forest, but did that helped? The main factor being energy in all this cases - a serious lack of energy and options leads to degeneration humans. The main factor being energy in all this cases - a serious lack of energy and options leads to degeneration humans. The man is an accountant and the woman is a nurse. The ones which were able to dominate both their environment and other human group were those in charge - the progressive form of the moment. The only true Celts (aka Indo-Europeans) will be those from central Europe. The prices appear to be so reasonable." The number of Britons living in Bulgaria has doubled in the past year (some 1,152 were given residency in 2005). The progressive one is the typical human further development, more versatile and generalised, whereas primitive means phylogenetic and infantile ontogenetic retardation in comparison.__________________Magna Europa est patria nostra STOP GATS! The progressive one is the typical human further development, more versatile and generalised, whereas primitive means phylogenetic and infantile ontogenetic retardation in comparison.are we supposed to take it just for granted? The vast majority of all genetic mutations are either neutral or deleterious with respect to the overall fitness of the organism in question. The vast majority of all genetic mutations are either neutral or deleterious with respect to the overall fitness of the organism in question. The working class English is the one who goes to the ghetto coastal spots like Benidorm in Alicante or Maspalomas in Gran Canaria. Then they are likely to bring in their cheap life-style in.There's been some conflicts already and with them I wish that us Spaniards were not the nice people that we are. There are only foreigners (I think most English, Scandinavian and German) in their little community. There is no direct correlation between nasal shape and intelligence, but since the forms with a narrow refined nose have usually other progressive traits too, there is an indirect one which was proven in some studies I read, you might search for them. These Brits think the French are arrogant. These mutant strains will push out the formerly dominant strains and take over. These mutant strains will push out the formerly dominant strains and take over. They are negative in any conceivable way. They have renovated crumbling farmhouses, or dabbled in organic farming. They have sent their children to Bulgarian schools. They only want to be away from home and enjoy the sunny climate, and it does not matter much where that place is located. They took a certain path, and for the path they were going, they progressed, natural selection made them more perfect than they were when they started. They took a certain path, and for the path they were going, they progressed, natural selection made them more perfect than they were when they started. This fact led to the extinction or at least supersession of them. This fact led to the extinction or at least supersession of them. This is no implicit teleological approach, its a simple truth. This means the further this evolution goes, the more potential the animal has for the specialisation it approaches. This means the further this evolution goes, the more potential the animal has for the specialisation it approaches. This versatile and generalist human character is what progressive means for our species at least. This was because they were for their niche much better adapted than those lifeforms which lived isolated, in that way protected and had not to deal with such strong competitors as in Eurasia. This was because they were for their niche much better adapted than those lifeforms which lived isolated, in that way protected and had not to deal with such strong competitors as in Eurasia. To degrade all life on this planet to monads again will mean degeneration from that perspective. To give a simple physical example, I might refer to bipedy and balance. Vulgar here is intended to mean common, ordinary. We can use reason and our human intelligence to distinguish for ourselves what was, is and will be more promising. What do Spanish people say in private about these expats? What do you mean with "vulgar"? What is progressive today can be - in theory - primitive tomorrow. What makes them worse is that they don't stay in the ghettos but pretend to want to integrate somehow. What we can see, what we can do to prevent that we should do and if not getting to constructivistic you should see and should do the right things as well.__________________Magna Europa est patria nostra STOP GATS! Whether humans gain the potential to keep up higher life forms, probably even beyond the existence of this planet, or no one will. You bringing it like the nature of evolution can equal "progress" to a higher form is errorful and unsupported, stating that evolution is a form of progress, when in fact it’s not. You bringing it like the nature of evolution can equal "progress" to a higher form is errorful and unsupported, stating that evolution is a form of progress, when in fact it�s not.Well, my example was clear whether you like to reject it or not. You can make your own studies on that or searching for the respective threads, even though I know this won't impress you too much because you are a relativist it seems.However, next step is sexual selection and attractiveness. You cant compare the relation of Homo sapiens to Homo erectus with two stages of development in colonies of bacteria with their limited variation which will in the end just repeat itself until a major advantage will occur - f.e. You cant compare the relation of Homo sapiens to Homo erectus with two stages of development in colonies of bacteria with their limited variation which will in the end just repeat itself until a major advantage will occur - f.e. You do realize this is totally subjective and you still have failed to support it with the minimal amount of data which i asked for. You do realize this is totally subjective and you still have failed to support it with the minimal amount of data which i asked for.